TY - JOUR TI - An Application of Conceptual History to Itself. From Method to Theory in Reinhart Koselleck‘s Begriffsgeschifte AU - Palonen, Kari T2 - Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought DA - 1997/// PY - 1997 VL - 1 SP - 39 EP - 69 LA - English UR - http://www.jyu.fi/yhtfil/redescriptions/Yearbook%201997/Palonen%201997.pdf KW - #nosource ER - TY - ELEC TI - LIBRIS - Skapa referenser UR - http://libris.kb.se/export.jsp?type=showrecord&q=onr%3a198595xpzl6ljtsm&id=198595xpzl6ljtsm&d=libris&posts=1 Y2 - 2020/04/07/06:10:12 KW - #nosource ER - TY - BOOK TI - The lost history of liberalism: From ancient Rome to the twenty-first century AU - Rosenblatt, Helena AB - "The Lost History of Liberalism challenges our most basic assumptions about a political creed that has become a rallying cry - and a term of derision - in today's increasingly divided public square. Taking readers from ancient Rome to today, Helena Rosenblatt traces the evolution of the words "liberal" and "liberalism," revealing the heated debates that have taken place over their meaning. In this timely and provocative book, Rosenblatt debunks the popular myth of liberalism as a uniquely Anglo-American tradition centered on individual rights. It was only during the Cold War and America's growing world hegemony that liberalism was refashioned into an American ideology focused so strongly on individual freedoms."-- CY - Princeton DA - 2018/// PY - 2018 DP - libris.kb.se PB - Princeton University Press SN - 978-0-691-20396-6 ST - The lost history of liberalism KW - #nosource KW - Liberalism-- historia ER - TY - JOUR TI - RHETORICAL AND TEMPORAL PERSPECTIVES ON CONCEPTUAL CHANGE AU - Palonen, Kari DP - Zotero SP - 19 LA - en KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - THE “THEORETICAL REVOLUTION” IN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY: FROM THE HISTORY OF POLITICAL IDEAS TO THE HISTORY OF POLITICAL LANGUAGES AU - Palti, ElíAs José T2 - History and Theory AB - This article intends to clarify what distinguishes the so-called new “politico-intellectual history” from the old “history of political ideas.” What differentiates the two has not been fully perceived even by some of the authors who initiated this transformation. One fundamental reason for this is that the transformation has not been a consistent process deriving from one single source, but is rather the result of converging developments emanating from three different sources (the Cambridge School, the German school of conceptual history or Begriffsgeschichte, and French politico-conceptual history). This article proposes that the development of a new theoretical horizon that effectively leads us beyond the frameworks of the old history of political ideas demands that we overcome the insularity of these traditions and combine their respective contributions. The result of this combination is an approach to politico-intellectual history that is not completely coincident with any of the three schools. What I will call a history of political languages entails a specific perspective on the temporality of discourses; this involves a view of why the meaning of concepts changes over time, and is the source of the contingency that stains political languages. DA - 2014/10// PY - 2014 DO - 10.1111/hith.10719 DP - Crossref VL - 53 IS - 3 SP - 387 EP - 405 LA - en SN - 00182656 ST - THE “THEORETICAL REVOLUTION” IN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY UR - http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/hith.10719 Y2 - 2018/08/22/11:43:21 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - Review: Quentin Skinner's 'Post-modern' History of Ideas Reviewed Work(s): Visions of Politics, Volume I: Regarding Method. Volume II: Renaissance Virtues. Volume III: Hobbes and Civil Science by Quentin Skinner AU - LAMB, ROBERT T2 - History DA - 2004/// PY - 2004 DP - Zotero VL - 89 IS - 3 SP - 424 EP - 433 LA - en UR - http://www.jstor.org/stable/24427650 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - Emotional translations: Conceptual history beyond language AU - Pernau, Margrit AU - Rajamani, Imke T2 - History and Theory AB - Conceptual history is a useful tool for writing the history of emotions. The investigation of how a community used emotion words at certain times and in certain places allows us to understand specific emotion knowledge without being trapped by universalism. But conceptual history is also an inadequate tool for writing the history of emotions. Its exclusive focus on language fails to capture the meanings that can be derived from emotional expressions in other media such as painting, music, architecture, film, or even food. Here emotion history can contribute to a rethinking of conceptual history, bringing the body and the senses back in. This article proposes a theoretical model to expand conceptual history beyond language by exploring three processes of emotional translation: First, how the translation between reality and its interpretation is mediated by the body and the senses. Second, how translations between different media and sign systems shape and change the meanings of concepts. Third, how concepts translate into practices that have an impact on reality. The applicability of the model is not limited to the research on concepts of emotion; the article argues that emotions have a crucial role in all processes of conceptual change. The article further suggests that historicizing concepts can best be achieved by reconstructing the relations that actors have created between elements within multimedial semantic nets. The approach will be exemplified by looking at the South Asian concept of the monsoon and the emotional translations between rain and experiences of love and romance. DA - 2016/02// PY - 2016 DO - 10.1111/hith.10787 DP - Crossref VL - 55 IS - 1 SP - 46 EP - 65 LA - en SN - 00182656 ST - Emotional translations UR - http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/hith.10787 Y2 - 2018/08/22/11:43:27 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - Nineteenth-Century German Citizenships: A Reconsideration AU - Fahrmeir, Andreas K. T2 - The Historical Journal DA - 1997/// PY - 1997 DP - Zotero VL - 40 IS - 3 SP - 721 EP - 752 LA - en UR - http://www.jstor.org/stable/2639885 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - What's the Big Idea? Intellectual History and the Longue Durée AU - Armitage, David T2 - History of European Ideas AB - Historians of all kinds are beginning to return to temporally expansive studies after decades of aversion and neglect. There are even signs that intellectual historians are returning to the longue dure´e. What are the reasons for this revival of long-range intellectual history? And how might it be rendered methodologically robust as well as historically compelling? This article proposes a model of transtemporal history, proceeding via serial contextualism to create a history in ideas spanning centuries, even millennia: key examples come from work in progress on ideas of civil war from ancient Rome to the present. The article concludes with brief reflections on the potential impact of the digital humanities on the practice of long-range intellectual history. DA - 2012/12// PY - 2012 DO - 10.1080/01916599.2012.714635 DP - Crossref VL - 38 IS - 4 SP - 493 EP - 507 LA - en SN - 0191-6599, 1873-541X ST - What's the Big Idea? UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01916599.2012.714635 Y2 - 2018/08/22/11:43:30 KW - #nosource ER - TY - CHAP TI - Translation as Cultural Transfer and Semantic Interaction: European Variations of Liberal between 1800 and 1830 AU - Leonhard, Jörn T2 - Why Concepts Matter A2 - Burke, Martin A2 - Richter, Melvin DA - 2012/05/11/ PY - 2012 DP - Crossref SP - 93 EP - 108 LA - en PB - Brill SN - 978-90-04-19490-8 ST - Translation as Cultural Transfer and Semantic Interaction UR - http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/books/b9789004194908_006 Y2 - 2018/08/22/11:43:36 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - From Ideas to Moves in Argument AU - Collingwood’s, R G DP - Zotero SP - 8 LA - en KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - Doing Our Own Thinking for Ourselves: On Quentin Skinner's Genealogical Turn AU - Lane, Melissa T2 - Journal of the History of Ideas DA - 2012/// PY - 2012 DO - 10.1353/jhi.2012.0002 DP - Crossref VL - 73 IS - 1 SP - 71 EP - 82 LA - en SN - 1086-3222 ST - Doing Our Own Thinking for Ourselves UR - http://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/journal_of_the_history_of_ideas/v073/73.1.lane.html Y2 - 2018/08/22/11:43:37 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - WAS MAX WEBER WRONG ABOUT WESTMINSTER? AU - Palonen, Kari AB - Guenther Roth once called Max Weber ‘the would-be Englishman’. The characterization can be extended to Weber’s admiration for the Westminster Parliament and its political practices. Later German scholars have disputed the accuracy of Weber’s interpretation of British parliamentarism, claiming it was distorted by his critique of the contemporary German situation. The author’s thesis is that Weber well understood the Westminster practices, while his critics misunderstood in particular his distinction between ‘working’ and ‘talking’ parliaments (Arbeitsparlament vs. Redeparlament). German political scientists of the post-war era have neglected the Westminster tradition of parliamentary committees and reduced parliamentarism to a system of government, whereas for Weber it still refers to a political culture of debate. DA - 2013/// PY - 2013 DP - Zotero SP - 19 LA - en KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - Facing Asymmetry: Nordic Intellectuals and Center–Periphery Dynamics in European Cultural Space AU - Nygård, Stefan AU - Strang, Johan T2 - Journal of the History of Ideas DA - 2016/// PY - 2016 DO - 10.1353/jhi.2016.0006 DP - Crossref VL - 77 IS - 1 SP - 75 EP - 97 LA - en SN - 1086-3222 ST - Facing Asymmetry UR - https://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/journal_of_the_history_of_ideas/v077/77.1.nygard.html Y2 - 2018/08/22/11:43:28 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - Towards a history of parliamentary concepts AU - Palonen, Kari T2 - Parliaments, Estates and Representation AB - The aim of this article is a conceptual historical analysis of parliamentarism with a focus on intra-parliamentary concepts, their origins, changes and the disputes around them. The formation of a distinct parliamentary vocabulary helps us to distinguish parliaments from other assemblies. Neither conceptual nor parliamentary histories, however, have directed any attention to the concepts by which parliaments operate for conducting and regulating their deliberations, using ordinary language concepts but giving them a specific parliamentary meaning. The procedural tracts for Westminster from the late sixteenth to the early twentieth century provide strategic sources for the politics and history of intra-parliamentary concepts. In this article, four types of parliamentary concepts of action and debate are distinguished, namely those referring to parliamentary moves, to parliamentary order, to parliamentary time and to parliamentary agenda. They refer to different aspects of parliamentary debates; they have different histories in terms of intentional or tacit conceptual changes, and explicit disputes around the concepts. In terms of classical rhetoric, moves refer to elocution, their regulation by order and time to two forms of disposition, and the agenda to the invention. The opposition between ‘parliamentary’ and ‘unparliamentary’ uses of concepts can be understood in the sense of Reinhart Koselleck’s distinction between symmetric and asymmetric use of political concepts. DA - 2012/11// PY - 2012 DO - 10.1080/02606755.2012.719697 DP - Crossref VL - 32 IS - 2 SP - 123 EP - 138 LA - en SN - 0260-6755, 1947-248X UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02606755.2012.719697 Y2 - 2018/08/22/11:43:39 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - Transnational Conceptual History, Methodological Nationalism and Europe AU - Marjanen, Jani DP - Zotero SP - 36 LA - en KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - Quentin Skinner: The History of Politics and the Politics of History AU - Pocock, J. G. A. T2 - Common Knowledge DA - 2004/10/01/ PY - 2004 DO - 10.1215/0961754X-10-3-532 DP - Crossref VL - 10 IS - 3 SP - 532 EP - 550 LA - en SN - 0961-754X, 1538-4578 ST - Quentin Skinner UR - https://read.dukeupress.edu/common-knowledge/article/10/3/532-550/25345 Y2 - 2018/08/22/11:43:48 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - Introduction: A Focus on the History of Concepts AU - Goudarouli, Eirini T2 - Contributions to the History of Concepts AB - The special section “Knowledge Quests in the European Periphery” attempts to explore the different ways in which conceptual history’s methodologies could be applied to disciplines with which traditional conceptual historians have not previously engaged, such as the history of science, political economy, Enlightenment studies, postcolonial history, and transnational history. This special section, when read as a whole, opens up a multidisciplinary space in which center-periphery tensions are examined in the context of conceptual transnational exchange. Coming from different geographical places and cultural spaces within the European periphery, the three case studies draw their methodological background from conceptual history and aim to reflect on the center-periphery dichotomy by asking how historians from different historiographical traditions could take advantage of the methods and theories of conceptual history, as well as how conceptual history could take advantage of the coming together of disciplines that traditionally do not communicate with each other. DA - 2017/01/01/ PY - 2017 DO - 10.3167/choc.2017.120104 DP - Crossref VL - 12 IS - 1 LA - en SN - 1807-9326, 1874-656X ST - Introduction UR - http://berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/contributions/12/1/choc120104.xml Y2 - 2018/08/22/11:43:44 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - Koselleck in America AU - Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig T2 - New German Critique DA - 2017/11// PY - 2017 DO - 10.1215/0094033X-4162298 DP - Crossref VL - 44 IS - 3 132 SP - 167 EP - 187 LA - en SN - 0094-033X, 1558-1462 UR - https://read.dukeupress.edu/new-german-critique/article/44/3 (132)/167-187/131946 Y2 - 2018/08/22/11:43:49 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - Verbalizing a Political Act: Toward a Politics of Speech AU - Pocock, J. G. A. T2 - Political Theory DA - 1973/// PY - 1973 DP - Zotero VL - 1 IS - 1 SP - 27 EP - 45 LA - en UR - http://www.jstor.org/stable/191074 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - The civilizing process in London’s Old Bailey AU - Klingenstein, Sara AU - Hitchcock, Tim AU - DeDeo, Simon T2 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DA - 2014/07/01/ PY - 2014 DO - 10.1073/pnas.1405984111 DP - Crossref VL - 111 IS - 26 SP - 9419 EP - 9424 LA - en SN - 0027-8424, 1091-6490 UR - http://www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1405984111 Y2 - 2018/08/22/11:43:52 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - An interview with Quentin Skinner AU - Prokhovnik, Raia T2 - Contemporary Political Theory DA - 2011/05// PY - 2011 DO - 10.1057/cpt.2010.26 DP - Crossref VL - 10 IS - 2 SP - 273 EP - 285 LA - en SN - 1470-8914, 1476-9336 UR - http://link.springer.com/10.1057/cpt.2010.26 Y2 - 2018/08/22/11:43:50 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - The Spatial and Temporal Layers of Global History: A Reflection on Global Conceptual History through Expanding Reinhart Koselleck's "Zeitschichten" into Global Spaces AU - Schulz-Forberg, Hagen T2 - Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung AB - Die raumlichen und zeitlichen Schichten der Globalgeschichte: Überlegungen zu einer globalen Begriffsgesehichte anhand der Ausweitung von Reinhart Kosellecks Zeitsehichten in globale Raume*. Recent debates on global history have challenged the understanding of history beyond the nation state. Simultaneously, they search for non-Eurocentric approaches. This has re percussions on the relation between historical space and time in both historical interpretation and in research design. This article reflects on the possibilities of a global conceptual history by expanding Reinhart Koselleck's theory of tem poral layers (Zeitsehichten) into global spaces. To this end, it introduces the no tion of spatial layers (Raumsehiehten). First, historicisation and its relation to and interaction with spatialisation and temporalisation is pondered; then, the impact of global spatial and temporal complexities on comparative and con ceptual history is considered, before, thirdly, a framework of three tensions of global history - normative, temporal and spatial - is introduced as a way to concretely unfold historical research questions through global conceptual his tory. Regarding time and space, the main lines of argument in global history have focused either on the question of whether or not European powers were ahead of non-European ones or on the supposedly Western linearity of time as opposed to a non-Western cosmology or circularity of time. Taking its point of departure in Zeitsehichten, which break from the linear-vs.-circular logic, this article instead proposes to foreground an actor-based, multi-lingual, global conceptual history to better understand spatio-temporal practices. DA - 2013/// PY - 2013 DP - Zotero VL - 38 IS - 3 SP - 40 EP - 58 LA - en UR - http://www.jstor.org/stable/23644524 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - AGAINST PERIODIZATION: KOSELLECK'S THEORY OF MULTIPLE TEMPORALITIES AU - Jordheim, Helge T2 - History and Theory AB - In this essay I intend to flesh out and discuss what I consider to be the groundbreaking contribution by the German historian and theorist of history Reinhart Koselleck to postwar historiography: his theory of historical times. I begin by discussing the view, so prominent in the Anglophone context, that Koselleck’s idea of the plurality of historical times can be grasped only in terms of a plurality of historical periods in chronological succession, and hence, that Koselleck’s theory of historical times is in reality a theory of periodization. Against this interpretation, to be found in works by Kathleen Davis, Peter Osborne, and Lynn Hunt, among others, I will argue that not only is Koselleck’s theory of historical times, or, with a more phenomenlogical turn of phrase, his theory of multiple temporalities, not a theory of periodization, it is, furthermore, a theory developed to defy periodization. Hence, at the core of Koselleck’s work is the attempt to replace the idea of linear, homogeneous time with a more complex, heterogeneous, and multilayered notion of temporality. In this essay I will demonstrate how this shift is achieved by means of three dichotomies: between natural and historical, extralinguistic and intralinguistic, and diachronic and synchronic time. DA - 2012/05// PY - 2012 DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00619.x DP - Crossref VL - 51 IS - 2 SP - 151 EP - 171 LA - en SN - 00182656 ST - AGAINST PERIODIZATION UR - http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00619.x Y2 - 2018/08/22/11:43:59 KW - #nosource ER - TY - JOUR TI - Quentin Skinner's revised historical contextualism: a critique AU - Lamb, Robert T2 - History of the Human Sciences AB - Since the late 1960s Quentin Skinner has defended a highly influential form of linguistic contextualism for the history of ideas, originally devised in opposition to established methodological orthodoxies like the ‘great text’ tradition and a mainly Marxist epiphenomenalism. In 2002, he published Regarding Method, a collection of his revised methodological essays that provides a uniquely systematic expression of his contextualist philosophy of history. Skinner’s most arresting theoretical contention in that work remains his well-known claim that past works of political theory cannot be read as contributions to ‘perennial’ debates but must instead be understood as particularistic, ideological speech acts. In this article I argue that he fails to justify these claims and that there is actually nothing wrong at all with (where appropriate) treating past works of political theory as engaged in perennial philosophical debates. Not only do Skinner’s arguments not support the form of contextualism he defends, their flaws are actually akin to those he identified in his critique of previous methodological orthodoxies. DA - 2009/07// PY - 2009 DO - 10.1177/0952695109104423 DP - Crossref VL - 22 IS - 3 SP - 51 EP - 73 LA - en SN - 0952-6951, 1461-720X ST - Quentin Skinner's revised historical contextualism UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0952695109104423 Y2 - 2018/08/22/11:44:09 KW - #nosource ER -