[
    {
        "key": "72DI96ST",
        "version": 1,
        "library": {
            "type": "group",
            "id": 39302,
            "name": "7806EBL",
            "links": {
                "alternate": {
                    "href": "https://www.zotero.org/groups/7806ebl",
                    "type": "text/html"
                }
            }
        },
        "links": {
            "self": {
                "href": "https://api.zotero.org/groups/39302/items/72DI96ST",
                "type": "application/json"
            },
            "alternate": {
                "href": "https://www.zotero.org/groups/7806ebl/items/72DI96ST",
                "type": "text/html"
            }
        },
        "meta": {
            "createdByUser": {
                "id": 502046,
                "username": "cbigum",
                "name": "Chris Bigum",
                "links": {
                    "alternate": {
                        "href": "https://www.zotero.org/cbigum",
                        "type": "text/html"
                    }
                }
            },
            "creatorSummary": "Bates",
            "numChildren": 0
        },
        "data": {
            "key": "72DI96ST",
            "version": 1,
            "itemType": "journalArticle",
            "title": "The Impact of Educational Research: alternative methodologies and \nconclusions*",
            "creators": [
                {
                    "creatorType": "author",
                    "firstName": "Richard",
                    "lastName": "Bates"
                }
            ],
            "abstractNote": "Recent controversy regarding the nature, organization and impact of educational research in \nthe UK (Hargreaves, 1996; 1997; 1999; Hammersley, 1997; Tooley, 1998; Hillage et al., 2000; \nBall, 2001) seems to devote little attention to research on the impact of educational research. \nThis paper examines a recent Australian report (The Impact of Educational Research, DETYA, \n2000) in terms of both its conclusions and its methodologies. It suggests that the impact of \neducational research on both policy and practice is often complex and indirect rather than linear \nand straightforward and that the methodologies employed in assessing such impact need to be \nsimilarly complex. Moreover, it would appear that this particular research supports Atkinson’s \n(2000) contention that the ways in which educational research is typically produced and utilized \nis as part of a complex conversation about a diversity of purposes, effects and judgements rather \nthan a more technically oriented implementation of ‘what works’. \nKeywords: Education research; Australia research; research policy; research impact; research \npractice",
            "publicationTitle": "Research Papers in Education",
            "publisher": "",
            "place": "",
            "date": "",
            "volume": "17",
            "issue": "4",
            "section": "",
            "partNumber": "",
            "partTitle": "",
            "pages": "403-408",
            "series": "",
            "seriesTitle": "",
            "seriesText": "",
            "journalAbbreviation": "",
            "DOI": "10.1080/0267152022000031379",
            "citationKey": "",
            "url": "",
            "accessDate": "",
            "PMID": "",
            "PMCID": "",
            "ISSN": "",
            "archive": "",
            "archiveLocation": "",
            "shortTitle": "",
            "language": "",
            "libraryCatalog": "",
            "callNumber": "",
            "rights": "",
            "extra": "",
            "tags": [],
            "collections": [],
            "relations": {},
            "dateAdded": "2011-02-24T01:12:42Z",
            "dateModified": "2011-02-24T01:12:42Z"
        }
    }
]